tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12263366.post112456104811817601..comments2023-08-10T12:30:07.083-07:00Comments on Post-cocious: The "best" choices for encoding your musicAnuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10681387485517846478noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12263366.post-5782567300652511452009-01-04T10:06:00.000-08:002009-01-04T10:06:00.000-08:00Brad, if this is the case then you are left with a...Brad, if this is the case then you are left with a few choices. 1.) Keep listening to the 128 kbps. 2.) Go out and buy the music again. 3.) Download the music<BR/><BR/>thats about it. Once encoded down to 128 kbps you can't do anything to that file to make it greater than 128 at that time.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01375985378201500945noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12263366.post-7447790808938994782007-11-21T15:12:00.000-08:002007-11-21T15:12:00.000-08:00What if I'm stuck with a bunch of albums encoded a...What if I'm stuck with a bunch of albums encoded at 128 kbps and don't have the CD's laying around anymore? Any advice?Bradhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01636259781242433163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12263366.post-1125059642526165542005-08-26T05:34:00.000-07:002005-08-26T05:34:00.000-07:00I've been doing MP3 at 160kbps since the dawn of m...I've been doing MP3 at 160kbps since the dawn of my MP3 player days. An agnostic format is crucial for me. I don't want to be tied to any particular kind of hardware (firmware, really, but you know). Also, at 160, I definitely notice the difference, but it's palatable compared to the crappy 128. And it still leaves enough space to cram tons of music in.isaacjosephsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00060205898557221694noreply@blogger.com